CA State Auditor Says CA ALPR Use Imperils Privacy

A state audit of license plate reader use by CA law enforcement agencies requested by State Senator Scott Weiner concluded that existing policies were largely not compliant with existing state law and that laws needed to be strengthened.

The CA State Auditor stated “the law enforcement agencies we reviewed must better protect individuals’ privacy through ensuring that their policies reflect state law. In addition, we found that these agencies must improve their ALPR data security, make more informed decisions about sharing their ALPR data, and expand their oversight of ALPR users.”

 The auditor went on to state: “the statewide survey of law enforcement agencies we conducted found that 70 percent operate or plan to operate an ALPR system, and this raises concerns that these agencies may share the deficiencies we identified at the four agencies we reviewed”.

Kick The Tires of the CCPA

In celebration of Data Privacy Day (earlier this week), and the operational start of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), privacy advocates invited CA legislators to take the law out for a spin.

Our practice companies: Tik-ToK, a youth-oriented social media network, and Experian, one of the 3 leading credit bureaus in the country.

While legislators are trying out their new law, you can also join the impromptu test. See if you can find out what Tik-Tok and Experian have collected about you, and ask them to stop selling it, and tell us how it goes!

Oakland Privacy’s Year in Bullet Points

Some of the things Oakland Privacy had a hand in in 2019…

  • Urban Shield – Dead.
  • San Francisco enacts a surveillance equipment regulation ordinance (SERO) and facial recognition ban.
  • Oakland and Berkeley pass facial recognition bans.
  • Oakland rejects new Bearcat for OPD.
  • Richmond, CA terminates its Vigilant ALPR contract, honoring their ordinance prohibiting doing business with ICE contractors.
  • Oakland Privacy receives EFF’s Barlow award “extending freedom and innovation in the realm of information technology.”
  • Two dozen industry bills designed to weaken the CA Consumer Privacy Act before it went into effect defeated or reduced to neutral impact.
  • California revised Use of Force legislation passed and signed into law.
  • Three year moratorium on police use of facial recognition in California signed into law.
  • Oakland begins process of creating a police militarized equipment regulation ordinance, similar to its surveillance equipment regulation ordinance.
  • Berkeley passes ordinance requiring that certain commercial establishments accept cash, following in San Francisco’s footsteps earlier in the year.

A flyer with this information and a short writeup about Oakland Privacy, etc:

Privacy Groups Comment on CA AG Privacy Regs

California’s statewide privacy coalition weighed in on the regulatory plans for the California Attorney General to administer and enforce the California Consumer Privacy Act.

The verdict? Pretty good job by Becerra’s office, but a few things can always be better. Like what? Read on.

And grab a copy of a request to a company to quit selling your data. You can start filing on January 1!

(Thank you to Common Sense Media for the template form.

Anti-Muslim Hate Group Uses Same Name As State-Funded PVE Program

California’s new counter-terrorism via social services program, Preventing Violent Extremism (PVE), which is a state version of the federal Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program, has run into a big problem.

A hate speech problem. A group called the Clarion Project, identified by both the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Center for American Progress as an Anti-Muslim hate group, has decided to get in on the preventing extremism project.

Legal Tender for All Debts, Public and Private.

We know very well that if trends continue, we will have no privacy left.

Moving towards a cashless society means every purchase we make can and will be tracked, analyzed and stored. Driverless cars will insure – if ALPRs and facial surveillance haven’t already – that we won’t be able to go anywhere without our origins, routes and destinations tracked. The “Internet of Things” ultimately will ensure that every device we interact with will record our use of it. Computers that respond to our verbal commands could be recording everything we say. It is not even beyond the realm of foreseeable technological possibility that our very thoughts could be analyzed.