AC Transit Adopts BRT Camera Privacy Policy

At the September 9 meeting of the AC Transit Board of Directors, the board unanimously adopted a privacy policy for the cameras that will line the bus stops of the new rapid transit line from DT Oakland to San Leandro. The policy was reviewed by a working group that included Oakland Privacy and the Electronic Frontier Foundation and was chaired by AC Transit counsel Jill Sprague.

The privacy policy instructs that all footage is to be destroyed after 30 days, unless footage is linked to a specific ongoing investigation, requires annual reporting to the public, and prevents data transfer to immigration enforcement or any third party without specific written authorization. It is modeled on the camera policy in place for the Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

That said, community concerns remain as several public speakers pointed out the low level of trust in AC Transit’s law enforcement agent – the Alameda County Sheriff’s Department. And despite our best efforts, the AC Transit Board was not yet ready to introduce a fully enforceable ordinance.

We hope that will change in the future, but this is a positive first step. We thank AC director Chris Peeples for initiating the privacy policy effort.

Obstructed Public Records Requests at Oakland PD Lead to Lawsuits

A collective of journalists and researchers, including Oakland Privacy and our research director Mike Katz-Lacabe have sued the Oakland Police Department for delaying public records requests – for years and years.

A pair of lawsuits, one initiated by journalists Scott Morris, Sarah Belle Lin, and researchers Brian Krans and Katz-Lacabe, and the other initiated by reporters Ali Winston and Darwin Bond Graham, cite records requests from as far back as 2014 that have accrued dozens of time extentions with no end in sight.

The Morris/Belle Lin/Krans/Katz-Lacabe/Oakland Privacy lawsuit is a class action on behalf of all overdue public records requests on file with the City of Oakland.

You can read the class action complaint below.

OP Joins Consumer Groups Supporting The Payment Choice Act

Prominent consumer and privacy protection groups have joined together to support federal legislation ensuring the ability to buy goods and services with cash.

The letter states:

Noncash transactions generate vast amounts of data, recording the time, date, location, amount, and subject of each consumer’s purchase. Those data are available to digital marketers and advertisers who are engaged in developing and refining increasingly sophisticated techniques to identify and target potential customers. Paying with cash provides consumers with significantly more privacy than do electronic forms of payment.

Read the full letter below

San Ramon Approves Massive Surveillance Increase

San Ramon, a small city in Contra Costa County with a very low crime rate, approved spending more than $1.2 million to blanket the city in automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and surveillance cameras at its April 28, 2020, meeting.

The amount includes 12 stationary ALPRs at five locations from Vigilant Solutions, 35 ALPRs from Flock Safety and 46 Avigilon surveillance cameras. Eight police vehicles are already equipped with Vigilant ALPRs and Flock Safety cameras are already installed at the intersection of Camino Ramon and Crow Canyon and the northeast intersection of Crow Canyon Boulevard and Crow Canyon Place.

Map showing proposed locations of Flock license plate readers in San Ramon
Purple icons represent proposed locations of Flock Safety ALPRs in San Ramon.

PVE Funding Cut From State Budget

The #NoPVEinCalifornia coalition was successful in persuading the CA State Legislature to remove funding to staff the Preventing Violent Extremism program (renamed as Creating Safer Communities).

The state program, modeled after the federal Countering Violent Extremism, doles out grants to social service and educational institutions to try to identify incipient terrorists in their midst.

The NoPVEinCA Coalition celebrates the critical step taken by the state Legislature and the Committee on Budget to refuse state funding for PVE and CSC, surveillance programs modeled after the DHS and FBI’s “Countering Violent Extremism” (CVE) program, in response to community demands amplified and supported by the Coalition’s work.