Drones

SFPD Violates State Military Equipment Law

by  •  • 0 Comments

The San Francisco Police Department has confirmed in writing that they acquired 6 DJI drones in May of 2024, without requesting Board of Supervisors authorization or getting an approved use policy as required by State Law (AB 481-2021-Chiu).

We are not surprised as language in Proposition E, as we pointed out earlier this year, purported to authorize drone usage outside the state’s required military equipment procurement process. As we stated, (and informed the City) – “A local ballot intitiative cannot alter state law when the state law governs charter counties by statute and AB 481 does so”.

We’re not sure why SFPD and City Attorney Chiu, who authored AB 481 when in the Assembly, want to waste taxpayer money getting a judge to order them to follow state law.

Facial Recognition

Opt Out of Clearview AI Giveaway

by  •  • 0 Comments

Clearview AI, the notorious facial recognition software that scraped pictures from the world’s social media and then sold them to the police for a perpetual line-up, has been hit with a blizzard of well-deserved litigation. Cases from all over the country were consolidated, and a class action settlement was proposed. It’s a doozy – and not in a good way.

Read more →

Data Privacy

$115 Million Dollar Settlement in Katz-Lacabe v. Oracle Privacy Lawsuit

by  •  • 0 Comments

A class action lawsuit against Oracle Corporation for violating state and federal privacy laws by asssembling digital dossiers on people and selling them was settled for $115 million dollars. OP member Mike Katz-Lacabe was a primary named plaintiff.

Oracle assembled profiles on where people browsed online, and where they did their banking, bought gas, dined out, shopped and used their credit cards and then used the data in IDGraph which created “relevant personalized experiences”. Oracle has since discontinued IDGraph.

As part of the settlement, Oracle agreed to not to gather user-generated information from URLs of previously visited websites, or text that users enter in online forms other than on Oracle’s own websites.

The settlement covers people whose personal information Oracle collected or sold since Aug. 19, 2018.

News Coverage

Reuters: Oracle Reaches 115 Million Consumer Privacy Settlement

The Register: Oracle Coughs Up 115 Million Dollars To Make Privacy Case Go Away

Bloomberg: Oracle Will Pay 115 Million Dollars to Settle Customer Tracking Lawsuit

PPC Land: Oracle’s 115 Million Privacy Settlement Reshapes Data Collection Landscape

Data Privacy

Why I Opposed AB 3080

by  •  • 0 Comments

by Saoirse Grace, 2024 Privacy Rights Fellow

Much has been written about the legal, social, and practical reasons AB 3080 must be stopped. I agree—it must be. For those unfamiliar, AB 3080 is a bill in the California state legislature that proposes to force Adult Industry content providers to verify users’ age. As of August 18 the bill did not emerge from the suspense file in the Appropriations Committee. But we can assume this won’t be the last try. One thing that is missing from this discourse is how people weaponize concepts like morality, a desire to protect children, and urgency in order to create a state of affairs in which laws that would otherwise be plainly outlandish can take root.

Read more →

Uncategorized

And …. We Are A Non-Profit

by  •  • 0 Comments

Non-profit industrial complex, here we come.

Seriously, we are pleased to announce that after 12 years as an anarchist collective, Oakland Privacy has finally taken the plunge into 501c3 status. Our Tax ID# is 93-4007475.

What this means for you: You can make a *tax-deductible* donation to Oakland Privacy. If you happen to be a foundation, you can give us a grant.

What this means for us: We have more paperwork to do. We do not anticipate any major changes to our operations. Our core group is now a board of directors and we formally adjourn our semi-annual board meetings. But we intend to operate collectively, as always, and function as a volunteer group, as always.

On to the brave new world …

Uncategorized

Meet Saoirse Grace – 2024-2025 Privacy Rights Fellow

by  •  • 0 Comments

Oakland Privacy is pleased to annouce that Saoirse Grace has been selected as the 2024-2025 Privacy Rights Fellow. The fellowship is a part-time advocacy and organizing position generously funded by the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment.

Here is a bit about Saoirse: Please join us in welcoming her to Oakland Privacy!

Saoirse Grace is a transsexual Oakland-based researcher who applies postmodern and postcolonial theory to questions of gender, surveillance, itinerancy, homelessness, privacy, and art. She graduated Magna cum Laude from the University of San Francisco School of Law in 2016 and has written about critical legal theory, critical race theory, immigration law reform, the GDPR, and the application of Constitutional law to cutting-edge technology and its uses by state actors and private enterprise. She has extensive experience with the Freedom of Information Act, the California Public Records Act, and has published an exhaustive analysis of the Third Amendment’s applicability to Section 215 of the Patriot Act.

Saoirse has been involved in progressive organizing in the Bay Area since she moved here in 2013. She is an excellent bicycle mechanic, an award-winning experimental filmmaker, the former voice of Berkeley Bowl on X, and an avid Formula 1 fan (the cars, not the races).