Oakland Privacy’s Year in Bullet Points 2023

Some of the things Oakland Privacy had a hand in in 2023:

  • California Fusion Center Research Project initiated by Oakland Privacy
  • Bad facial recognition state legislation killed.
  • ALPR regulation bill introduced in CA legislation and sponsored by Oakland Privacy..
  • Oakland Privacy’s letters of support and objection are quoted extensively by legislative analysts for a number of bills re: privacy, surveillance, policing and transparency.
  • Oakland will replace its aging, cruiser-mounted (but currently disabled) ALPRs with lots of new Flock fixed-location ALPRS, BUT will reduce to retention time to 30 days from its current six months to two years.
  • Newsom signs 20 bills supported by Oakland Privacy in the areas of privacy, surveillance, and governmental transparency and vetos a bill (at our request) to expand the focus areas for California’s fusion centers.
  • City of Pasadena tables a proposed cell site simulator purchase after Oakland Privacy warns them they are violating state law.
  • Oakland Privacy reveals that Kaiser Permanente is using Flock cameras in their medical center parking lots across the State .
  • ALCO Board of Supervisors agrees to end the use of scattershot munitions in the mental health housing unit at Santa Rita Jail. ALCO also agrees to re-establish drone video retention to 60 days unless entered into evidence, remove boilerplate authorization language inserted into the policy in 2021, and to add to the policy a blanket prohibition on the weaponization of drones.

2022 2021 2020 2019

We’re Hiring! 2024 Privacy Rights Fellowship

The application period ends Wednesday January 31st at midnight Pacific Standard Time. We will not be able to accept any applications after the deadline passes. We are thrilled to have so many strong candidates to choose from.

Oakland Privacy has once again been generously funded by the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment for a part-time fellow to aid us in our work and help us expand its scope.

The 2024 Privacy Rights Fellowship begins on March 1st, 2024 for a duration of one year.

This is a unique opportunity to do hands-on implementation of enhanced privacy rights and enact social change beyond research and white papers.

Please read the description and application. Forward to others who might be interested or apply yourself. Applications are due by January 31, 2024.

Why We Can’t Censor Our Way Out of Online Harms

by Tracy Rosenberg

Online Harms Need A Structural Solution: Ham-Handed Censorship Won’t Fix It

There is no doubt about it. Internet 2.0 made some people a lot of money. The quandary of the early 2000’s of how to monetize the Internet was answered by the rise of surveillance capitalism, and those positioned to grab the data in Silicon Valley have made (and in some cases lost) vast fortunes.

But as the early 2000’s receded, it became abundantly clear that the economic miracle of the monetized Internet had grave societal harms. Not just the obvious one of the institutionalization of an oligopoly of Big Tech firms who had scaled beyond any semblance of real competition, but kitchen sink harms that included the exploitation of children and youth, sexual abuse, black markets for harmful drugs and guns and the spread of virulent disinformation.

Not surprisingly, the large-scale distribution and increasing visibility of harmful content led to desires to make the “bad content” go away, some broadly recognized as such and other more ambiguously characterized as such depending on ideology.

Kaiser Conducting Mass Surveillance of its Members

Kaiser Permanente has been conducting mass surveillance of its members for years and is sharing that information with law enforcement.

Public records requests and publicly-available information have revealed that numerous Kaiser Permanente facilities in California have installed surveillance cameras that capture information about every vehicle that enters a facility. The cameras function as automated license plate readers (ALPRs) but also capture an image of anything that triggers a motion sensor.

KPIX-TV Coverage – https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/kaiser-permanente-license-plate-readers-privacy-advocates-allege-not-following-sb34/

There They Go Again

City of Pasadena agendizes purchase of a cell site simulator (stingray) with no usage policy

Pasadena, the Socal city that among other things houses Cal-Tech, is following in the City of Vallejo’s inglorious foosteps by putting the purchase of a (completely unnecessary) cell site simulator or stingray on an upcoming agenda for a vote – without the usage policy required by state law (AB 741-2015).

Oakland Privacy’s 2021 lawsuit against the City of Vallejo re-affirmed state law and instructed cities and counties throughout the State to follow it.

Our letter to the Pasadena City Council telling them not to break the law is below.

The Threats of London Breed

Four years after the passage of San Francisco’s surveillance ordinance by a vote of 10-1, SF mayor London Breed is threatening to ask city voters to gut it via ballot inititative. Breed’s proposed ordinance would, among other things, allow surveillance tech like drones which are not currently used by the SF Police, to be adopted for a year before the city’s Board of Supervisors could approve, disapprove or adopt a use policy. The new year-long free zone could also apply to the killer robots, whose deployment last year was halted by the Board of Supervisors.

The Board of Supervisors seems unlikely to collaborate in putting the initiative on the ballot, so Breed’s path to San Francisco voters would likely be through paid ballot signature collection firms.

Press coverage of the proposed Breed ballot measure is below.